Supplier Monitoring
Gain Visibility Into Critical Suppliers to Assess
Risk with Confidence
Continuous supplier monitoring provides the necessary foundation. It is a key component of effective Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and helps organizations continuously assess and appropriately manage risks in supplier relationships. At the same time, you can meet requirements arising from laws, regulations, standards, and industry frameworks, including:
- Legal and regulatory requirements such as DORA, MaRisk, NIS-2, and KRITIS
- Requirements from standards such as ISO 9001 and ISO 27001
- Internal requirements
- Industry requirements such as TISAX or AirCyber
In practice, not every supplier is equally important to an organization. Accordingly, monitoring measures should also be risk-based. Assessing all suppliers according to the same approach often primarily creates additional effort. It makes more sense to align the level of effort and depth of review with the importance of the respective supplier.
Jan Kemper, Principal usd Security Audits
Why Choose usd AG for Supplier Monitoring?
What Can You Expect from Supplier Monitoring by usd AG?
The scope and depth of supplier monitoring depend on criticality, risk exposure, and regulatory requirements. The key is to determine which evidence is sufficient and when additional audit procedures are necessary. Not every supplier requires the same level of monitoring. What matters are the risks associated with the service and the supplier’s importance to your business processes, systems, or information.
Typical Measures for Supplier Monitoring:
- Reviewing self-assessments and questionnaires
- Evaluating third-party certificates and attestations, such as ISO 27001 certificates, or ISAE 3402 reports, and BSI C5 attestations
- Analyzing the records and documentation provided
- Conducting supplier audits in cases of elevated risk.
A more in-depth review may be required for selected suppliers. The scope, audit focus, and approach depend on the service provided, the associated risks, and the audit objectives. In practice, a structured process consisting of preparation, audit execution, and follow-up has proven effective:
Ihr Titel
Preparation
- Aligning on scope and approach
- Selecting the topics and evidence to be reviewed
- Announcing the audit and coordinating with internal stakeholders and, subsequently, the supplier
Audit Execution
- Reviewing documentation and evidence
- Interviewing relevant contacts
- Conducting an on-site or remote audit
- Assessing security requirements and controls
Follow-Up
- Evaluating the results
- Documenting findings
- Presenting the results
- Identifying and tracking measures
To prevent risks from going undetected, supplier monitoring should be reviewed regularly and adapted to changing circumstances. The appropriate measures and review frequency depend in particular on the supplier’s criticality, the outsourced service, and the current risk exposure.
Conducting Pooled Audits, for Example Under DORA
As part of our supplier audit offering, we also conduct pooled audits. In a pooled audit, a supplier is audited in the interest of several organizations. This can offer an efficient, resource-conscious alternative to separate audits. Regulatory requirements such as DORA also provide for pooled audits as a possible form of audit in certain contexts.
Learn More About Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM)
Third-Party Risk Management: Basics
Third-Party Risk Management: How to Set Up a TPRM Program
Information Security in Third-Party Risk Management:How to Monitor Your TPRM Program
TPRM: EBA Publishes Guidelines on Third-Party Risk Managementfor Non-ICT Services
